IntakeShield Analytics scores every plaintiff record for fraud before your firm invests further — protecting your MDL portfolio from synthetic identities, duplicate claimants, and lead mill fraud.
By the time a fraudulent plaintiff record reaches your case management system, your firm has already paid for intake, screening, and onboarding. IntakeShield identifies fraud before your team invests further — at the moment you receive the signed client record.
Fabricated claimants built from mismatched real data — names, addresses, and contact information that don't belong together. Standard intake forms cannot detect these inconsistencies.
A single device submitting multiple claimants under different names is one of the strongest fraud signals available. Without device intelligence, this pattern is completely invisible at intake.
AI-generated and copy-paste injury narratives submitted in bulk by fraudulent lead sources. Similarity detection catches near-duplicates even when key details are slightly changed.
Some marketing companies and call centers have systemic fraud rates. Without per-source tracking, you cannot identify which partners are generating the most fraudulent records — or hold them accountable.
Every signed plaintiff record is run through a multi-layer verification process. Each check contributes to an overall risk score — no single signal makes a determination on its own.
Identifies the physical device used to submit the intake — and whether that same device has appeared across multiple claimants under different names. One device, many claimants is a primary fraud indicator.
Verifies who actually owns the phone number — carrier, line type (mobile, landline, or VOIP), account age, and whether the subscriber name matches the claimant. Virtual and prepaid numbers are scored differently.
Detects automated submissions, AI-generated intake responses, and scripted form-filling. Catches lead mill submissions that bypass human intake entirely before they reach your case file.
Identifies disposable, temporary, and high-risk email addresses. Flags addresses created minutes before submission, that have never received a real email, or that belong to known fraud networks.
Determines where the inquiry actually originated — country, region, city, and provider. Flags VPN usage, proxy servers, TOR exit nodes, and connections that mask the true originating location.
Cross-references the claimant against public records databases to verify identity consistency, address history, and deceased-person indicators. Confirms the person exists as described.
Verifies the claimant's address is real, deliverable, and consistent with the identity provided. Detects mail-drop addresses, commercial forwarding services, and addresses inconsistent with the claimed exposure location.
Checks every incoming record against all prior leads in your campaigns using hashed identity keys — phone, email, address, date of birth, and name. Catches the same person submitting under variations of their information.
Analyzes the claimant's injury narrative for similarity to other submissions in the same campaign. Catches templated, AI-generated, and paraphrased duplicate narratives that manual review misses entirely.
Checks whether the name, phone, email, address, and date of birth provided all belong to the same real person — or whether they appear to be assembled from mismatched data points.
Every marketing company and call center accumulates a fraud rate over time. High-fraud sources are flagged automatically, and their history is factored into every future lead they generate.
Cross-references claimant identity against death records to identify submissions made on behalf of deceased individuals — a direct indicator of organized fraud at the lead source level.
IntakeShield integrates with your existing intake flow. Send us a signed client record via webhook, CSV, or API — we return a complete fraud intelligence report within seconds.
Your call center, marketing company, or case management system pushes the signed plaintiff record to IntakeShield via webhook, CSV upload, scheduled pull, or secure file transfer. We accept any format and normalize it automatically — no changes required on your end.
The record is checked across our full verification suite — device, phone, email, IP, identity, address, public records, prior leads, and narrative similarity. Each check contributes independent signals to the overall fraud assessment.
Signals are scored across five independent classes. No single check dominates the result — a claimant needs to fail across multiple independent indicators to score high. The score runs from 0 to 100 across four risk tiers.
Your firm receives a structured fraud report with the risk score, tier classification, and a clear explanation of what triggered any flags — written for attorneys and case managers, not analysts. High-risk records are flagged for review before any further investment.
Results arrive via direct webhook to your CRM, scheduled CSV export, or email summary — on your schedule, in your preferred format. Delivery is configured per campaign and requires your approval before any record is released.
Every record receives a score from 0 to 100 and falls into one of four risk tiers — each with a clear recommended action for your team.
IntakeShield produces a risk recommendation — not a legal determination. Reports use language like "likely fraud pattern" or "high-confidence fraud indicators detected" — never "criminal fraud." Final disposition on every record remains entirely with your firm and its attorneys.
IntakeShield's reporting suite gives your firm complete visibility into fraud patterns across every dimension of your plaintiff portfolio — from individual lead scoring down to multi-firm cross-campaign trend analysis.
Every campaign your firm runs is tracked independently — fraud rate trends, score distributions, tier breakdowns, and flagged client queues are all available per campaign. Compare campaigns side-by-side to identify which case types and lead sources are driving your highest fraud concentrations.
Track your campaign's fraud rate week-over-week and month-over-month. Identify when a lead source started degrading in quality and tie it to specific intake periods.
See the full spread of risk scores across every record in a campaign. Identify bi-modal distributions that suggest two distinct populations — legitimate claimants and a fraud cluster.
Understand which fraud signals are driving the most weight across a campaign — device reuse, narrative duplication, VPN concentration, or identity mismatches.
Urgent review and recommended review queues per campaign, sorted by risk score. See the specific flag reasons for each record in plain language — ready to share with your case managers.
Feed retained, dropped-fraud, and dropped-other outcomes back into the system. IntakeShield learns which fraud patterns resulted in confirmed bad clients and weights them accordingly going forward.
Compare fraud rates, average scores, and tier distributions across all your active campaigns in a single view. Identify outlier campaigns that warrant immediate attention.
Every marketing company and call center that generates leads for your campaigns is tracked with its own fraud rate, trend history, and outcome record. Stop guessing which partners are worth renewing — the data tells you exactly which sources are contaminating your portfolio.
Every marketing company ranked worst to best by fraud rate. Updated continuously as new leads are scored. Share with your procurement team before renewing any lead source contract.
Separate fraud rate tracking for each call center handling your intake. Identify whether fraud is originating at the marketing level or being introduced during the intake call itself.
See which fraud signals are most prevalent from each source. A source generating mostly device-reuse fraud is different from one generating identity mismatch fraud — and the remediation is different.
Track how a source's fraud rate is moving over time. A source that was clean six months ago and is now at 40% fraud signals a change in their lead generation practices that warrants an immediate conversation.
See how the same marketing company performs across different case types and different law firm campaigns. A source that looks fine on one tort may be systematically fraudulent on another.
Export source quality reports formatted for vendor review meetings, contract negotiations, or network exclusion decisions. All backed by data, not anecdote.
Understand fraud patterns at the case-type level — across all campaigns, all firms, and all lead sources. Know which torts are disproportionately targeted by fraudulent lead mills and plan your intake screening accordingly before a new campaign goes live.
Roundup, Talcum Powder, Camp Lejeune, NEC Formula, Hair Relaxer, AFFF — each with its own fraud rate profile based on aggregate scoring data across all campaigns on the platform.
Before your firm launches a new campaign, IntakeShield can provide the historical fraud baseline for that tort type — so your team knows what fraud rate to expect and can set screening thresholds accordingly.
Understand which signals drive fraud in each case type. Narrative duplication is the dominant signal in some torts; device reuse is dominant in others. Knowing this helps you prioritize which checks matter most for a given campaign.
Map fraud rates by geographic origin — identify states, regions, or ZIP codes with disproportionate fraud concentrations for a given tort type. Useful for call center routing and source qualification decisions.
Across all campaigns in a tort type, identify clusters of nearly-identical narratives that suggest coordinated lead mill activity — even when originating from different marketing companies or call centers.
Understand how your campaign's fraud rate compares to industry aggregate benchmarks for the same tort type — without any cross-firm data exposure. Your records remain fully isolated.
High-level reporting designed for managing partners and firm leadership — not analysts. Monthly and quarterly executive summaries translate your fraud intelligence into dollar-denominated risk exposure, portfolio health metrics, and actionable recommendations that don't require technical knowledge to act on.
Dollar-denominated estimate of the contingency fee exposure at risk from high-fraud records currently in your portfolio — calculated from your campaign contract values and current fraud rates.
One-page snapshot of how your fraud rates have moved across all active campaigns — improving, degrading, or stable — with the key drivers called out in plain language.
The top records, campaigns, and lead sources requiring immediate attention — prioritized by risk severity and potential financial exposure. Formatted for a 10-minute partner review.
Ranked list of your lead sources with their current fraud rates, trend direction, and a plain-language recommendation — continue, watch, or terminate — for each partner relationship.
Total records scored, cleared, flagged, held, and delivered in the reporting period. Complete throughput summary showing the full scope of verification activity conducted on your behalf.
Quarterly deep-dive report with longitudinal trend analysis, campaign comparison, source quality trajectory, and forward-looking risk flags for campaigns planned in the next quarter.
Complete visibility into the status of every record from the moment it arrives through to final delivery. The disposition tracking layer ensures nothing leaves the system without your approval — and everything that does is permanently logged for your records.
All records scoring above the high-risk threshold are surfaced immediately in a prioritized review queue — with the specific flag reasons and recommended action displayed prominently.
Records with moderate or ambiguous fraud indicators are held separately for firm review — with full scoring details so your team can make an informed disposition decision.
Every record delivered — to which firm, via which method, at what time, and with what payload — is permanently logged. Full chain of custody from intake to delivery for every record ever processed.
Place individual records or entire campaigns on hold with a reason logged. Remove holds individually or in bulk. Complete visibility into what is gated and why, with a full history of hold and release actions.
Track what your firm ultimately did with each record — retained, dropped for fraud, dropped for other reasons, or under investigation. Feed outcomes back to improve future scoring accuracy.
When your team is ready to automate, delivery can be configured to run on a daily or weekly schedule — pushing all approved records to your CRM, CSV destination, or email in a single batch. The gate can be re-enabled at any time.
Campaign isolation is not a feature — it is a contractual and architectural requirement. Every lead, score, and report is locked to your firm's campaigns. Nothing crosses firm boundaries at any layer of the system.
Cross-campaign fraud intelligence — such as identifying a marketing company with elevated fraud rates across multiple clients — is available as an aggregate metric only. No individual claimant records from another firm are ever visible, accessible, or queryable by your team, and vice versa.
Fraud reports are delivered on your schedule, in your preferred format. Nothing leaves the system automatically — every report requires your approval before delivery.
Real-time delivery to your CRM or case management system. Results POST automatically to your existing workflow the moment a record is scored and approved.
Daily or weekly CSV reports filtered by campaign, date range, and risk tier. Import directly into any spreadsheet or case management tool with no reformatting required.
Automated summary reports delivered to your inbox on your schedule. No technical integration required — just a report when you need it.
All delivery is held by default. Your team reviews and approves before any record is released. The gate can be removed per campaign when volume justifies automation.
Every score, every flag, and every delivery action is written to a permanent, tamper-proof log. If a record is ever questioned — by your firm, by opposing counsel, or in any proceeding — you have a complete chain of custody from intake to delivery.
IntakeShield integrates with your existing intake flow in days. No format changes required from your lead sources. Start with one campaign.